2000 - Peer Review Articles of Related Work

Previous Years:  2002 · 2001

Review of "The Costs and Benefits of Smaller Classes in Wisconsin" by Thomas Hruz (Wisconsin Policy Research Institute)
Date:
September 12, 2000
Reviewed By:
Institution:
Eastern Michigan University
The WPRI's critique of Wisconsin's SAGE class-size reduction program ignores data that clearly demonstrates the benefits of small class size. The document also improperly uses studies that show no benefit from lower pupil-teacher ratios to impugn the benefits of class-size reduction, when the two measures are not equivalent.
Report
Press Release
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Executive Summary
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Review of "No Excuses: Lessons From 21 High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools" by Samuel Casey Carter (Heritage Foundation)
Date:
July 1, 2000
Reviewed By:
Presented as a roadmap for urban school reform, "No Excuses" lacks the academic rigor that would make it a practical source of guidance, and fails in its attempt to rebut an argument central to the debate over educational quality, namely that economically distressed schools need more resources.
Report
Press Release
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Executive Summary
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Review of "The Impact of School Choice on Integration in Milwaukee Private Schools" by Howard L. Fuller and George A. Mitchell (Institute for the Transformation of Learning)
Date:
June 26, 2000
Reviewed By:
This report asserts that adding religious schools to the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program has increased integration in private schools, particularly religious schools. It presents no trend data necessary to support its claim, however, and ignores data that implies the opposite.
Report
Press Release
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Executive Summary
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Review of "The State of State Standards" (Thomas B. Fordham Foundation)
Date:
February 2, 2000
Reviewed By:
The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation's rating of states based on their implementation of rigorous educational standards fails to disclose the basis of how evaluations were actually conducted, and its criteria and findings are divorced from real-world performance.
Report
Press Release
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)
Executive Summary
Hypertext Markup Language (HTML)  HTML (Not Available)